The DOJ case titled US v. Daniel R. Marold was a civil action seeking a permanent injunction related to product classification, marketing language, and ingredient compliance under federal law, not a criminal charge or conviction. This article breaks down why the complaint was filed, clarifies common misconceptions about criminal liability or intent, explains what a permanent injunction actually means, and outlines the steps taken since the filing, including halting non-compliant distribution, removing prohibited ingredients, and rebuilding Chill6 with a compliance-first approach.





